B R L - C A D B E N C H M A R K
=================================
Looking for the BRL-CAD raytracer
...found executable ./bench/../src/rt/rt
Looking for a benchmark geometry directory
...found directory ./bench/../db
Looking for a benchmark reference image directory
...found directory ./bench/../pix
Looking for a benchmark reference log directory
...found directory ./bench/../pix
Looking for a pixel comparison utility
...found executable ./bench/pixcmp
Looking for a time elapsed utility
...found script ./bench/../sh/elapsed.sh
Using [./bench/../src/rt/rt] for RT
Using [./bench/../db] for DB
Using [./bench/../pix] for PIX
Using [./bench/../pix] for LOG
Using [./bench/pixcmp] for CMP
Using [./bench/../sh/elapsed.sh] for ELP
Using [32] for TIMEFRAME
Using [300] for MAXTIME
Using [3] for DEVIATION
Using [3] for AVERAGE
RT reports the following version information:
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.8 The BRL-CAD Raytracer RT
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.8 The BRL-CAD Ray-Tracing Library
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.8 The BRL-CAD Numerical Computation Library
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.8 The BRL-CAD Utility Library
Minimum run time is 3 minutes, 12 seconds
Maximum run time is 30 minutes
Estimated time is 9 minutes, 36 seconds
Running the BRL-CAD Benchmark tests... please wait ...
+++++ moss
Frame 0: 357882 rays in 1.01 sec = 352593.10 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 715764 rays in 1.89 sec = 378510.84 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 5: 11452224 rays in 27.62 sec = 414560.14 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 6: 11452224 rays in 28.09 sec = 407639.50 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
moss.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ world
Frame 0: 486660 rays in 2.78 sec = 174994.61 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 973320 rays in 5.14 sec = 189361.87 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 3: 3893280 rays in 20.55 sec = 189481.68 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
world.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ star
Frame 0: 312052 rays in 1.80 sec = 173651.64 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 624104 rays in 3.25 sec = 192032.00 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 4: 4992832 rays in 25.09 sec = 198965.17 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 5: 9985664 rays in 50.50 sec = 197735.92 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
star.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ bldg391
Frame 0: 375758 rays in 2.69 sec = 139790.92 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 751516 rays in 5.28 sec = 142278.68 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
bldg391.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ m35
Frame 0: 656360 rays in 4.00 sec = 164090.00 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786358 matching, 74 off by 1, 0 off by many
m35.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ sphflake
Frame 0: 1889266 rays in 10.38 sec = 182097.93 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
sphflake.pix: answers are RIGHT
... Done.
Total testing time elapsed: 20 minutes, 29 seconds
The following files have been generated and/or modified:
*.log ..... final log files for each individual raytrace test
*.pix ..... final pix image files for each individual raytrace test
*.log.* ... log files for previous frames and raytrace tests
*.pix.* ... pix image files for previous frames and raytrace tests
summary ... performance results summary, 2 lines per run
Summary:
Abs FthrNtr 407639.50 189481.68 197735.92 142278.68 164090.0
0 182097.93 213887.28 Wed Jun 20 20:07:08 EST 2007
*vgr FthrNtr 2975.25 2825.55 3526.59 2666.39 2321.26 12.28 2387.88
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
Benchmark results indicate an approximate VGR performance metric of 2388
Logarithmic VGR metric is 3.38 (natural logarithm is 7.78)
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
These numbers seem to indicate that this machine is approximately 2388 times
faster than the reference machine being used for comparison, a VAX 11/780
running 4.3 BSD named VGR. These results are in fact approximately 3.38
orders of magnitude faster than the reference.
Here are some other approximated VGR results for perspective:
120 on a 200MHz R5000 running IRIX 6.5
250 on a 500 MHz Pentium III running RedHat 7.1
550 on a dual 450 MHz UltraSPARC II running SunOS 5.8
1000 on a dual 500 MHz G4 PowerPC running Mac OS X 10.2
1500 on a dual 1.66 GHz Athlon MP 2000+ running RedHat 7.3
9000 on an 8 CPU 1.3 GHz Power4 running AIX 5.1
65000 on a 512 CPU 400 MHz R12000 Running IRIX 6.5
This appears to be a debug compilation of BRL-CAD.
Read the benchmark.tr document for more details on the BRL-CAD Benchmark.
The document is available at ./bench/../doc/benchmark.tr
You are encouraged to submit your benchmark results and system
configuration information to benchmark@brlcad.org
Benchmark testing complete.
IriX64@FthrNtr ~/brlcad-9.9.9
$