/usr/bin/sh ./bench/run.sh
B R L - C A D B E N C H M A R K
=================================
Looking for the BRL-CAD raytracer
...found executable ./bench/../src/rt/rt
Looking for a benchmark geometry directory
...found directory ./bench/../db
Looking for a benchmark reference image directory
...found directory ./bench/../pix
Looking for a benchmark reference log directory
...found directory ./bench/../pix
Looking for a pixel comparison utility
...found executable ./bench/pixcmp
Looking for a time elapsed utility
...found script ./bench/../sh/elapsed.sh
Using [./bench/../src/rt/rt] for RT
Using [./bench/../db] for DB
Using [./bench/../pix] for PIX
Using [./bench/../pix] for LOG
Using [./bench/pixcmp] for CMP
Using [./bench/../sh/elapsed.sh] for ELP
Using [32] for TIMEFRAME
Using [300] for MAXTIME
Using [3] for DEVIATION
Using [3] for AVERAGE
RT reports the following version information:
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Raytracer RT
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Ray-Tracing Library
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Numerical Computation Library
BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Utility Library
Minimum run time is 3 minutes, 12 seconds
Maximum run time is 30 minutes
Estimated time is 9 minutes, 36 seconds
Running the BRL-CAD Benchmark tests... please wait ...
+++++ moss
Frame 0: 357882 rays in 2.08 sec = 172224.25 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 715764 rays in 3.94 sec = 181758.25 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 3: 2863056 rays in 15.41 sec = 185840.32 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 4: 5726112 rays in 30.64 sec = 186877.45 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 5: 11452224 rays in 60.89 sec = 188077.45 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
moss.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ world
Frame 0: 486554 rays in 5.53 sec = 87968.54 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 973108 rays in 10.73 sec = 90648.16 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 2: 1946216 rays in 21.22 sec = 91720.44 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 3: 3892432 rays in 42.94 sec = 90652.38 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
world.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ star
Frame 0: 312052 rays in 3.36 sec = 92872.62 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 624104 rays in 6.62 sec = 94204.38 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 3: 2496416 rays in 26.08 sec = 95728.81 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 4: 4992832 rays in 51.73 sec = 96509.68 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
star.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ bldg391
Frame 0: 375758 rays in 4.83 sec = 77828.91 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 751516 rays in 9.53 sec = 78841.38 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 2: 1503032 rays in 19.06 sec = 78849.65 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 3: 3006064 rays in 37.47 sec = 80228.03 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
bldg391.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ m35
Frame 0: 656360 rays in 6.72 sec = 97687.16 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 1312720 rays in 13.11 sec = 100138.84 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 2: 2625440 rays in 25.81 sec = 101709.99 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 3: 5250880 rays in 51.22 sec = 102518.21 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786358 matching, 74 off by 1, 0 off by many
m35.pix: answers are RIGHT
+++++ sphflake
Frame 0: 1889266 rays in 17.75 sec = 106437.52 rays/sec (RTFM)
Frame 1: 3778532 rays in 34.89 sec = 108298.42 rays/sec (RTFM)
pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many
sphflake.pix: answers are RIGHT
... Done.
Total testing time elapsed: 9 minutes, 14 seconds
The following files have been generated and/or modified:
*.log ..... final log files for each individual raytrace test
*.pix ..... final pix image files for each individual raytrace test
*.log.* ... log files for previous frames and raytrace tests
*.pix.* ... pix image files for previous frames and raytrace tests
summary ... performance results summary, 2 lines per run
Summary:
Abs FthrNtr 188077.45 90652.38 96509.68 80228.03 102518.2
1 108298.42 111047.36 Sun Mar 4 15:01:27 EST 2007
*vgr FthrNtr 1372.72 1351.81 1721.23 1503.52 1450.25 7.30 1234.47
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
Benchmark results indicate an approximate VGR performance metric of 1234
Logarithmic VGR metric is 3.09 (natural logarithm is 7.12)
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
These numbers seem to indicate that this machine is approximately 1234 times
faster than the reference machine being used for comparison, a VAX 11/780
running 4.3 BSD named VGR. These results are in fact approximately 3.09
orders of magnitude faster than the reference.
Here are some other approximated VGR results for perspective:
120 on a 200MHz R5000 running IRIX 6.5
250 on a 500 MHz Pentium III running RedHat 7.1
550 on a dual 450 MHz UltraSPARC II running SunOS 5.8
1000 on a dual 500 MHz G4 PowerPC running Mac OS X 10.2
1500 on a dual 1.66 GHz Athlon MP 2000+ running RedHat 7.3
9000 on an 8 CPU 1.3 GHz Power4 running AIX 5.1
65000 on a 512 CPU 400 MHz R12000 Running IRIX 6.5
WARNING: This may not be an optimized compilation of BRL-CAD.
Performance results may not be optimal.
This appears to be a debug compilation of BRL-CAD.
Official benchmark results are optimized builds with all run-time
features enabled and optionally without compile-time debug symbols.
For proper results, run 'make clean' and recompile with the
following configure options added:
--enable-optimized --disable-debug
Read the benchmark.tr document for more details on the BRL-CAD Benchmark.
The document is available at ./bench/../doc/benchmark.tr
Benchmark testing complete.
IriX64@FthrNtr ~/brlcad-7.8.4.old
$